(January 11, 2019 at 6:51 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 11, 2019 at 6:42 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Still missing my point. I really don't care if you are arguing for or against science. Neither tactic prove your personal pet deity is the default position that is agreed on.
The progression with apologists of EVERY religion goes like this.
Club fan (insert religion here), "I have this really neat club I belong to."
Me, "Ok, so what, you are in the same boat as everyone of any other religion."
Club fan," Yea well, science doesn't know everything."
Me, "Yea sure, but there is lots science does know, and can rule out."
Club fan, "Yea well, I don't reject all science"
Me, "Yea, ok, but only and up until it conflicts with your beliefs, then you cherry pick."
Club fan, "No I don't"
Me, "Fine, spend some time debating people of all the world's religions. Then get back to me when you all come to a consensus."
Now, before you respond, keep in mind I have been at this since 2001, and have taken on Christians, and Muslims, and Jews and Hindus, and even Rastas a couple of times.
Sounds like you're trapped in your own little world where you are the brightest star. If you don't want to be scientific, then please don't waste my time trying to tell me about science.
"Look at me, look at me, I've taken on religious people since 2001 and must be given a consensus to proceed logically."
Around 3,000 cosmologists in the World today are actively publishing articles (typically, 2 to 3 per year) in professional, peer-reviewed scientific journals. Can you name anyone, a single physicist, who supports your ideas?
