RE: If it wasn't for religion
January 31, 2019 at 3:27 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2019 at 3:29 pm by Acrobat.)
(January 31, 2019 at 3:19 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote:(January 30, 2019 at 2:54 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Nope. Goodness and badness are not "stuff" floating around out there. They're designations of what acts belong to conceptual sets and why we think so.
The referent is some property or properties of an act.
No one thinks that we'll be filling any holes in the periodic table with goodium and badium.
Some physical/material property of an act? “Stuff” so to say?
And not some existing non-physical/immaterial property?