RE: If it wasn't for religion
February 1, 2019 at 1:22 pm
(This post was last modified: February 1, 2019 at 1:22 pm by Acrobat.)
(February 1, 2019 at 12:05 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Demonstrating, for the umpteenth time..that you cannot possibly comment on moral realism being contradictory, incoherent, or delusional.
Why not? Which component of you moral realism have I failed to understand? Referents? The material properties of acts you call bad? The Mental designations? Etc...?
Have I used any of these elements inappropriately when taking about dominos pizza? If so, how so?
Quote:The folks here run the gamut of positions on the issue. Some are realists, some are subjectivists, some are relativists, some are emotivists, some are nihilists. They advocate for their own positions without any need of reference to mine. Most...have disagreed with me on this issue in any given thread on the issue. It seems as if there's literally nothing about this issue on which you can cogently comment.
And why do you think they disagree with you? Because they fail to understand your position accurately? Out of ignorance? Because you failed to properly articulate and defend it?
