RE: are any of you honest enough to simply answer the question asked?
February 7, 2019 at 11:10 am
(This post was last modified: February 7, 2019 at 11:35 am by Mister Agenda.)
(February 1, 2019 at 12:37 pm)Drich Wrote: wow didn't think any more of you had it in you to stand against what pro choicers were saying. good for you! much respect!!
What the pro-choicers in your head were saying.
(February 1, 2019 at 12:52 pm)Drich Wrote: do I need to post the actual bill again? physical health is not the only way for mid birth abortion certification under this bill. a woman's mental health and stability are what's new. we've always had provision concerning health, how ever what this bill introduces is the mental (happiness) of the mother.
Mental health does not equal 'happiness', Drich. A physician must still certify that it's medically necessary. It might not be a good idea to force a madwoman to give birth, and even then I doubt you could find a physician that would sign off on an abortion when a healthy live birth without physical danger to the mother is practical.
(February 1, 2019 at 10:16 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Killing is killing. Abortion is nothing but a woman's decision to escape the dept that might result from a moment of lust that she failed to control.
That's why adultery should be a crime in the first place.
It's simple: just like thieves steal and psychopaths kill, a male or a female lusts and can either rape or have normal sex. The consequences are then met with murdering the child resulting from "the moment of sex".
Pure evil, disgusting if you ask me.
Most of the women who seek abortions are married, Atlas533, so adultery is irrelevant in all of those cases, eh? Maybe they can't afford another baby right then, or maybe something is seriously wrong with the fetus, or maybe the mother's health is in serous danger if she completes the pregnancy. Maybe she just had a baby and her body can't handle delivering another one so soon. Do you think a woman with three children should risk depriving them of their mother in order to have one more?
(February 2, 2019 at 6:55 pm)Yonadav Wrote:(February 2, 2019 at 6:35 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: Body autonomy is a thing.
For instance, you can't be forced to donate a part of your body for the benefit of another person. That's not a feminist premise. So fuck off with that shit. You are capable of making better arguments, I've seen you do it.
And, you can load up on all the black tar heroin your body can take. The purchase and transport of that heroin is illegal...but if you get your hands on it, you can do whatever you want with it as to putting it into your body. I sure am not going to stop you.
Like Drich...you are going for the extreme to get a reaction.
Oh, and fuck you with the 'you people' shit.
No, I'm not trying to get a reaction. I'm just trying to get people to argue in terms of facts, rather than the sound bites of feminist rhetoric.
Bodily autonomy is why you can't be forced to donate an organ, or give blood, even if it would save someone's life, or even if you're dead. Claiming feminists invented it specifically to justify abortion is the most ignorant thing I've read so far this morning, and you're competing with Drich on that front.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
