(February 14, 2019 at 9:38 am)Brian37 Wrote:(February 14, 2019 at 9:19 am)Yonadav Wrote: He never would have made a single national headline if it weren't for the fact that he is gay. He's another ivy league educated trickle down diversity candidate. Aside from an ivy league education, his resume is pretty thin.
Yea, just like, "He never would have become president if he were not black."
Why the fuck should it bother you if he is? Our original motto is "E-Pluribus Unum".
And no, he is 100% against Reagan's failed trickle down economics.
This is a problem with our species in it's entire history worldwide. Humans fear change, and your response here is more proof.
I voted for Obama for the same reason I voted for Hillary. And in 2020 if Trump suddenly announced he was a log cabin Republican, and was only married because he feared being out, he'd still be a fucking dick.
I think you fail to understand that our history started out in a very bigoted age, where only whites had any rights, and not even white women had the right to vote. I think America is far better of now as far as individual rights and I see no reason whatsoever gays should not be considered for public office.
And it is amazing to me you'd say such stupid crap identifying yourself as Jewish.
Yeah, you completely missed my point. I voted for Obama. I think that he was a pretty good president, although he sort of pissed me off when he backed off on making the rich pay their fair share after winning the 2012 election. Making the pay their fair share was one of his main 2012 campaign promises. But still, I have a pretty favorable view of Obama despite the fact that he is an Ivy League elitist.
You are an absolute pinhead for identity politics and trickle down diversity. He's black? So what? He's gay? So what? That someone is black or gay means absolutely nothing to me. But I do get a little bent out of shape when diversity pinheads want to vote for people just because they are black, gay, or female. Especially when the black, gay, or female candidate is an Ivy League elitist. Diversity doesn't trickle down, man. In fact, I think that trickle down diversity entrenches equality among the elite at the expense of common people. It is at the expense of common people because the elite live insular lives among the elite. So inequality is something far removed from their world, so it matters less.
So now you are gushing over an Ivy League elitist mostly because he is gay. That is true. You know damn well he never would have made a single national headline if he weren't gay. No one, anywhere, gives a shit about the mayor of Southbend Indiana. It's being a gay elitist that makes a story about him marketable.
Here's how trickle down diversity works:
Christine Blasey Ford makes a tenuous accusation against Bret Kavanaugh. The complaint is taken very seriously because she is Professor of Psychology at Palo Alto and also works at Stanford.
Jane Nobody calls the #MeToo hotline. She has names of witnesses, an exact date, and a specific location. She has pictures that were taken by witnesses and signed and dated by Bret Kavanaugh himself. Then the hotline operator asks Jane Nobody what her occupation is. Jane Nobody says that she's a waitress at Denny's. The hotline operator hangs up and makes a 'crazy' sign with her forefinger by the side of her head.
That's the crap that you want to vote for, dude.
Get excited about some candidates who attended half a dozen state universities in their quest for a four year degree. I don't care if they are black, gay, or female. AOC excites me. She was working as a bartender. That's what I'm talking about.
We do not inherit the world from our parents. We borrow it from our children.