If it wasn't for religion

[fredd bear]

That you keep asking questions of moral realism demonstrates that you lack the relevant subject knowledge to comment on it's being contradictory, incoherent, or delusional.

Do you understand? You would actually have to know what you were talking about.  You don't.

---

And why do you think they disagree with you?

@Gae Bolga

I have an opinion on that, actually.  If it weren't for religion, and how effectively the realist well was poisoned by other-than-realist superstition inaccurately claimed to be moral realism, it would be less of an uphill conversation.

It we really hard to refrain from sorting out what's his name but, as usual have done it for me, and far more succinctly.



I have two questions;

 I've read quite a few of your posts. We usually seem to be simpatico. I seem to have missed something. Where exactly have all these other people disagreed with you?.
Quite a list of isms. I agree with the one  I understand. Eg relativism, nihilism, err, that's about it, I don't understand 'moral realism, especially from a theist. I've always thought such people believe in moral absolutism.
Me?  Moral relativist, a bit nihilistic, cynic, realist, skeptic and misanthrope.-----that's today, I haven't had my coffee an I'm cranky.
I'd be me have a simple explanation of; emotional realism , subjectivism and emotivism. I suspect the last two are about personal perception and emotional perception (?) but really don't know.
Cheers