Evolution and Christianity and Salvation

[Drich]

google.com just like I said then key word alien seed earth that =
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia

then google panspermia then you get all sorts of links to things like:
https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/news/in-se...anspermia/
https://helix.northwestern.edu/article/o...mia-theory
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/lif...a-paradox/

can i do any more heavy lifting  for you? or do you feel like enough of a douche to maybe try and google what I suggested the first time around?

or do you still feel your knowledge of evolution is still at the pinnacle of man's theories of origins and you think I am ignorant because the lazy masses such as yourself has not been generally informed to change the way you think yet? Because that is all I am pointing out here.. the gap between what you think is moderning thought on the subject and what people are actually discussing now. Not what the general population retards think about evolution.

---

 but, instead, I was looking for scientific papers, that is, published articles in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.  Such would constitute a "citation"; my apologies for not being clearer, and no, I am not asking you to be my librarian.  Instead, I am trying to point out the fact that abiogenesis and evolution are really two separate subjects and areas of inquiry.

then google it retard hey-sus christos the same key word apply! Just add peer reviewed papers. otherwise know the word citation call for a simple reference from a book or paper concerning a specific subject. here for you "good people" I always start with teterary material and work my way up.. if you do not wish to follow this pattern of discovery and conversation, then like I said look it up yourself. because in my experience, if you can not discuss a subject in a common tertary way. then you will be lost in a primary reference like a peer reviewed paper.

The links that you listed are scientific programs, which I was aware of,

then why where you arguing against them? it seemed to me the only thing you where aware of was evolution from a void. I even used the scientific perfered term 'seeding' and it triggered nothing but piss and vinegar from you! in otherword from my perspective HTF am I supposed to know what you think you know when you argue against what you say you already understand?