Evolution and Christianity and Salvation

[Jehanne]

 but, instead, I was looking for scientific papers, that is, published articles in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.  Such would constitute a "citation"; my apologies for not being clearer, and no, I am not asking you to be my librarian.  Instead, I am trying to point out the fact that abiogenesis and evolution are really two separate subjects and areas of inquiry.

then google it retard hey-sus christos the same key word apply! Just add peer reviewed papers. otherwise know the word citation call for a simple reference from a book or paper concerning a specific subject. here for you "good people" I always start with teterary material and work my way up.. if you do not wish to follow this pattern of discovery and conversation, then like I said look it up yourself. because in my experience, if you can not discuss a subject in a common tertary way. then you will be lost in a primary reference like a peer reviewed paper.

The links that you listed are scientific programs, which I was aware of,

then why where you arguing against them? it seemed to me the only thing you where aware of was evolution from a void. I even used the scientific perfered term 'seeding' and it triggered nothing but piss and vinegar from you! in otherword from my perspective HTF am I supposed to know what you think you know when you argue against what you say you already understand?

First off, scientists speculate on all sorts of things, which, as all of them will tell you, is an area that is completely different than the corpus of scientific knowledge that is reflected in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, textbooks, etc.  And, so, panspermia is an hypothesis, and not a theory.  The Theory of Evolution by neo-Darwinian natural selection, on the other hand, is like the theory of gravity, a well-established fact of Nature.