Evolution and Christianity and Salvation

[Drich]

You make a dare that has already been satisfied.   It not possible to be more batshit crazy....than that.

You're daring people to stand on a line that they're already standing on.  WTF is wrong with you, and how did whatever that is happen?

where has it been satisfied? matter of fact are you not supposed to be finding examples of me lying? so which is it? this is not a game douche you are boarding slander here. am I a liar or am I crazy? show me an example of either, or are you just a simple minded troll! As that is all you've become. You have habitually failed to over turn any of my points biblical positions or arguments, so now like every other lazy intellect, you attack me personally like a poor man's john stewart but with the funny or any stated examples.

---

How dense are you? did you not read or was it you did not understand what I pointed out about the Jesus seminar? The short answer was the scholars vote counted for nothing, they where there only to feign legitmacy for slow minded people who did not seek any more truth thn 50 scholars voted and came to a consensus.. Again their votes mean nothing because 100+ average people also had a 1:1 vote meaning their vote counted as much as the scholars vote counted.

So again if a hundred regular people where ask is homosexuality evil and the bible say they should be stoned to death, how many regular people would think that to be immoral and vote what they think is moral despite what the bible says?

When you give 2twice the number regular people the same weight as a specialist then the specialists vote mean nothing. If this group wanted a real accurate interpretation of the bible regular people would not have twice the say as someone who has spent their lives in study.

here's the part I don't understand what you don't get when it comes to me reconciling my thoughts with proper reference material.. as I AM THE ONLY ONE who cites reference material when I make new or hard to accept points. meaning I am the only one who puts my own work behind scholars and what they have done and said via my constant quotations and citing of other works. 

It is beyond honest reasoning to accuse me of not researching my topics and or conclusions.

I dare you to challenge anything I have said from now back to my first post, and I will be able if i have not already provide some point of reference (something an expert has said at some point) which not only supports what my conclusions are, but often times fully support my thoughts scripturally

Show us your curriculum vitae; what degrees do you have, and from where?  And, what have you published and where?

what a simpleton.. Do I need to explain to you how reference material works??? When I quote another or leave their work or alink to their work it is not my education nor ablity that is in question. My role in this is but to sum up and present the work of other 'smarter men' in such a way that you all can not only understand it but phrase and produce it in such away as to illicit a response.. In a sense I am but a conduit putting a person before often times indisputable fact. now if you question the fact or youwant to argue the facts then you address the person who I have often time quoted.