RE: Evolution and Christianity and Salvation
March 8, 2019 at 11:23 am
(This post was last modified: March 8, 2019 at 11:25 am by Drich.)
(March 8, 2019 at 10:51 am)pocaracas Wrote:(March 8, 2019 at 10:44 am)Drich Wrote: Again NOT MY VIEWS RETARD! They represent a different section of MODERN SCHOLARSHIP. or are you so stupid to not understand 'science' is not in 100% agreement with it self? There are multiple theories on everything with as much sometimes more research behind it. for instance global warming is a late 80s sky is falling problem who was coined originally when nixon was president. Before that? 500 years of weather research that pointed to solar output along with orbital displacement (our relative position to the sun based on the fact we do not have a semitrical trajetory around the sun. we orbit more like a hula hoop around the sun and less like a bike wheel on an centralized axel. meaning when our orbit put us closer to the sun and when and if the sun is max output (as sun energy cycles) our planet warms and cools. Again! 500 years of this type of theory, and we get 20 years of the sky is falling unless we tax the countries and their people who have factories and cars! Next thing you know you all are bending over to pay you carbon tax.
Screw you, idiot!
you've got to be one of the dumbest people on this web site.
Do you not understand my discussion was not about what you believe, but the fact that there is 500 years of global weathr research that is contary to what is currently believed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperatur...1000_years
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles
Interestingly enough this milankovitch theory also jives with the holy grail of the sky is falling, the precious ice core samples. The only problem? can't make carbon tax work when the sun is naturally putting out more energy or less or the earth's orbit is off this year. can't blame the rich for altering the earths orbit can we?
Again you f-ing retard it is not what you believe but the fact there are very well researched alternatives that fit all of the evidence and yet provide a completely different conclusion/hypothesis!
NOW you belief comes in.. because you are now aware of two equally credible beliefs (one just happens to be hyped by pop culture and the media and the other all but buried because there is no money in it) You are demonstrating faith in believing in pop culture's 30 year old theory that says the world can be saved if we just pay our way out of this problem.
Do you get it? no you don't as you are one of the slowest members here. you still think this is about global warming.. because you don't actually read anything but the first two lines and the last two lines and if they don't make sense you just make up a straw man and attack it!
(March 8, 2019 at 11:03 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Bullshitting us about a ranchero again, lol. It doesn't matter whether or not eyewitness testimony is important in a court or to oxford law....because you don't have any eyewitness testimony to refer to in the first place.
Proof I DEMAND PROOF FOR YOUR CHARGES! SHOW ME WHERE I HAVE LIED OR APOLOGIZE!