(March 25, 2019 at 2:47 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:I think good old Ken has a rather casual relationship with the truth.(March 24, 2019 at 1:03 am)ignoramus Wrote: C'mon Fredd. Is an Aussie creatard even a thing?
I do agree about us being related to pigs though. Definitely on the inlaws side though!
(March 24, 2019 at 10:46 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Ken Ham.
Please take him back!
Just off the top of my head, there was the documented attempts at historical revisionism by his group, Answers in Genesis, which tried in 2009 to twist the words of the late Charles Spurgeon into its prescribed young-earth creationist mold.
Much more recently, the man we affectionately refer to around here as “K-Ham” or “Hammy” made the bizarre statement during a Google Plus live chat that he doesn’t “know where people get the idea that people rode dinosaurs.” He went on to say, “I mean, there’s no evidence in the Bible that that is so. I mean, when Job was looking at Behemoth, the description there, there’s nothing to do with people riding dinosaurs. We don’t know how people interacted with dinosaurs.”
While it’s certainly true that there is no evidence in the Bible that people rode dinosaurs (since, you know, dinosaurs as aren’t mentioned in the Bible at all), it is not true that K-Ham is completely ignorant of where the idea came from, since the idea came from him. That is, it can be traced to his books, such as “Dinosaurs of Eden: Tracing the Mystery Through History” (relevant excerpt seen here), and his “museum,” which includes a sculpted, saddled dinosaur that children may scamper aboard and have their picture taken upon.
http://www.godofevolution.com/young-eart...nce-again/
As for talking the slimy individual back to Oz. Geez I hope he's not thinking of coming back.
