(April 18, 2019 at 11:09 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(April 18, 2019 at 10:17 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: I believe that word, by itself, qualifies as hate speech regardless of anyone’s subjective intentions. And, I think it’s fair to say that hate speech is a violation of the prime directive.
Suppose I were to post, 'Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn contains more than 200 uses of the n-word', but substituted the actual word for the euphemism. Would you consider that a violation? Or suppose I did the same with the sentence 'No one deserves to be called "n-word" '.
Boru
Alright, fair point on both of the examples above, however, neither are comparable to what was going on in this thread.
He
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.