I thought your god was keeping you safe

[Amarok]

Logical reasoning is acceptable, as long as you don't smuggle shit into the arguement .....

I asked you to refute I can walk on water ..... and you failed, that doesn't prove I can walk on water.

Maybe use yours and your friends arugument style can prove I can walk on water ...


1) Whatever falls can be higher (False Premise)  Given gravity, there must be a point of first fall, any higher than which would not fall.  So higher than the point of first fall, that which first falls could not be higher.

2) If there is nothing solid higher then its floating

3) If you can float then you can walk on water

4) Therefore Madog can walk on water

---

At work.


I did note your list.

I also see other's have offered rebuttals already, so there's that as well.

Plus, it would seem, that your points specifically rest on your premises actually being , y'know, correct..... Or, better yet, 'Real'.

Cheers.

Yeah, look into the arguments.  They've been made and not successfully rebutted today.  It's amazing...

Here's another list by someone I'm sure you're familiar with.  Look into each of the arguments he gives (there are numerous videos for each of the arguments by this specific gentleman).  You can see them done in the classroom and in debate forums where they go unrefuted for years on end.  

So your whole case is just repeating craigs catalog of long refuted arguments.....Sad

---

At work.

Oh fek me.

Master Craig.

*Sigh/groan*

I really don't want or need to wade through the Kalam atm.

Since I'm otherwise currently engaged.

I read you loud & clear.  Handed what you asked for, and you're not interested!  Hahaha!  I get it....i get it.

Craig's sophistry has been debated to death

---

So now we are stooping to such lows as co-opting the views of others in support of your argument.

Let's face it christard, you are fast losing this one but don't realise it because you are too dumb.

That's the problem with christards.  Too dumb to realise how dumb they really are.  Look up Dunning-Kruger, sonny.

Besides, shouldn't you be off to crutch, er church, with mommy and daddy.  It is, after all, 'man on a stick day'?

---

Actually, they have been, many, many times before you began spouting your mindless and ill-devised fuckwittery.  You are just too stupid to realise.

Like I said, deal with the arguments and evidence.  Just calling someone names doesn't do anything to cover for your lack of intellectual curiosity.  I don't think I've ever dealt with any atheist who hasn't said essentially the same thing, but what I've also never seen......is an atheist who has actually attempted to grapple with the arguments & evidence.  I guess that's still the case, and I've been popping into places like this for 20 years or so now.  Amazing...!

Craig's arguments have been refuted to death the fact you have been at this 20 years and still think any of his idea's still work is either proof you are lying or never bothered to read any responses .

---

Why would that be?  I'm rationally justified in my belief in God.  Naturalism or materialism leads to determinism, which cannot be rationally affirmed.  Again I say, "who's deluded?

1. No you are not 

2. No it does not 

3. Both can be rationally affirmed 

4. It's still you I'm afraid