Ex pastor explains how Christianity is fake

[tackattack]

---

I do, if it comes up in conversation. People's sex lives usually don't concern me and aren't usually topics I delve into.

What have your views got to do with the statement you made? You weren't talking about your tap dancing version of christianity but doctrine 

You stated   ....

It is not a doctrine of Christian faith to judge others though.

---

My views are that I am a Christian and based in my understanding of popular Christian dogma from personal experience and study that Christians are not taught to judge other people. That would be reserved for God, and we are to love even our enemies.

---

But if I stated I believe that I am one, that acceptance is real 100% real, even if is delusional.

That is my point because you would be aware it is a lie, as you said

I could "pretend" that I was a 7'5" latino basketball star. It's not true and would require a significant amount of suspension of belief to fully convince myself. But if I stated I believe that I am one, that acceptance is real 100% real, even if is delusional.

Because every time you look at yourself in the mirror you would see the truth.

For instance there is a good example of what I'm talking about in documentary "Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief" where you can observe ex scientologists fanatically defending their scientology and then afterwards like they're out of hypnosis. There is something in people that they will spite even common sense if they feel victimized or some other similar reason.

I mean sure, maybe in the past you could say that Christians were honest in believing that world was few thousand years old, that some man saved all animals from a global flood in a boat, virgin birth etc. because people knew very little of how nature works and that's why it is said today that "God is dead" and believers in God are gravediggers.

Not to mention other lies that we mentioned that Christian leaders say to their flock like Obamacare is nazism - you know all of a sudden they believe it, no, they just accept it although they know it's not true.

---

That's what suspending the belief means. You "pretend" or delude yourself that what you're seeing isn't real.  People will go to all kinds of lengths to dellude themselves (in the example getting rid of all mirrors in the house). You suspend your belief until you can convince yourself that it's more true than false. Belief can be an integrated acceptance or a force of will. Mentally breaking a prisoner down or abusing a victim till they show Stockholm syndrome is a good example. At one point they believed that the abuser is bad, then they believed the abuser was good. The facts didn't change, but the emotional impact of those psychological inputs, changed the belief from one belief to another. Neither were fake belief. Logically we can see that one was more objectively true than another on the outside but from the individual perspective both were true.
I'll have to check out that documentary because I'm not seeing where we're disconnecting at. Side note- Any preacher that gives political advice from the pulpit should have their congregations tax exempt status pulled, as that's illegal.

---

You are correct. You never claimed I said those things. You just attested that I jump on the bandwagon of railroading all "fake Christians"
OK and how is my calling out one self-professed admitted faker  ..

A)judging someone unfairly?
B)Making biased generalizations about all people in that same group?

A) He isn't a self-professed faker. You're putting words in HIS mouth. He admitted to having a doubt.
B) If you're going to put words in his mouth, why not everyone else who admits to having a doubt? Because in his case the doubts won in the end? If your accusation of fakery is correct. he was never a Christian. And neither is any other professed Christian who harbors a doubt or misgiving. It isn't fair to swing in at the end and say he was always a fake, and give all the other doubters a free pass because they're still faking it.

---

It's not eyewitness testimony anymore when you're reporting what other people say they saw. It's hearsay.

---

A. No. The words were "I traveled on speaking teams, preached to thousands of teenagers at a time, wrote blogs, was published, formed curriculum, taught workshops, was an up-and-comer reforming my denomination. The whole time hoping at some point it would click, and become true for me. He  did admit to having doubts and questions, which is absolutely fine. He also admitted it wasn't true for him and that he later ascribed "faking it to make it".
B. Doubt and not knowing if something is true, are absolutely fine. Only in the anti-theists view that all Christians are illogical or unreasonable is questioning your belief not allowed. I was always allowed to ask questions and prompted to, and I didn't always find the answers, or the answers I wanted.Christians can harbor doubts and questions, that's rarely what causes people to leave the church, IMO. Most I've spoken with cite particular attitudes, people, dogma or a trauma as their reason. Bold for emphasis again, I'm not stating all Christians who have doubts are fake, just that this guy was by his own admission.