(July 8, 2019 at 5:23 pm)Losty Wrote:On point 1 Losty - So what I gather is that I, from my place of blind privilege, am expected to infer that people could be offended by what I do. I am also expected to read minds because people hide that "being different" shit so they can seem to fit in better? How about this for a utopian thought of the day: Everyone stop pretending to be shit you're not just to fit in and find a group that accepts you for all of you.
I could have had a question on the registration form that asked his religious affiliation, but that's a whole different SJW cause. If I can't ask what your beliefs are so as not to offend you and you refuse to tell people so you're not ostracized, what should I do exactly. If I want to know your belief so I can be more inclusive and not offend you or treat your different than you deserve, and I encourage an open dialogue with no judgment, I can't see doing much more than that. If you want to assume that asking "hey, do you go to church" will be followed by a pressured sales pitch. If you want to assume that I'm asking so that I can be hurtful and discriminatory towards you. If you want always go balls to the wall drama queen to solve your problems, I have nothing for you. I want rational and non-judgemental discussion. I want fair and equal treatment. I want everyone to feel included. You can't have those things with people on both sides behaving badly. One side can be judgmental, bigoted and push their beliefs and lives on others. The other side can blow up every discussion, hide the truth, and demonize well intentioned people.
Bottom line for point 1- Totalitarians believe that everyone should see what they see and do what they do. That's irrational and unproductive. It's also irrational and unproductive to want a discourse but to assume talking is futile and make a big stink over everything while hiding those very same parts of yourself you want discourse about. Please outline a way out this.
On the other 2 points, just to play devil's advocate, you said "hide my sexuality. I don’t want to be treated badly because of negative views that come with being an atheist." So if you are treated badly unintentionally because someone assumes your sexuality, because you're obfuscating it intentionally, who's fault is that? It's not really like straight people go into gay meetings looking for someone to intentionally mistreat, normally.
What I'm trying to point out is the primacy of the responsibility lies on the action and the intent. Intentional discrimination, oppression, bigotry all of those things are very bad and should be hate crimes. Blindly discovering someone is trans after some locker room jokes is cause for a change in attitude, but not punishment, IMO.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari