A timeless being cannot create

[tackattack]

If He is a personal God that "walks in the garden" with his creation, your fault is in your definition of "unaffected by temporal changes" . God is eternal, consistent and He is eternally Himself is usually the definition.

He is only eternally himself if he is absolutely static and does nothing whatsoever. 

It is like saying god is by definition 2+2=5 and never wrong in his math.

Concocting a definition does not make the ill conceived ignoramus fantasy Less ill conceived, less revealing of the ignorance of the fantasist, or less of a fantasy.

That a definition like this can be claimed only shows how shallow the concept of god is, and how pathetically besotted the adherents to this fantasy have become.

As Gae pointed out as well, I thought it was a commonly understood definition but apparently still needed to be pointed out. This isn't a definition I concocted or had to do word salad to line up. Let me show you an example,
"You are only eternally yourself if you are absolutely static and do nothing whatsoever." Doesn't that seem a little ridiculous? You are yourself always, whether you're inside or outside or cleaning a toilet. The fact you clean toilets for eternity doesn't make you any less you. In the case of this argument I am that I am.