The Best Logique Evidence of God Existence

[Bucky Ball]

Not sure if you're asking me. 
Heat energy is the movement of particles, not the particles themselves. 
So the idea that "everything there is" is quantum particles cannot be true.

They don't know what energy is.  They know how to use the notion but not what it is.  Just Like they don't know what gravity is but can use it.    I I think its better stated the movement of particles is the indication of "heat energy".  Its Like seeing if its windy outside by looking out the window.  The movement isn't the wind. 

Maybe change that to "everything we know is based on quantum particles."?  If space/time itself is quantized then everything being based on quantized is correct.

---

If going deeper than the immediate macroscopic world you can perceive is going into rabbit hole, then not going down rabbit holes means stop using most microelectronic devices that relies on quantum effects.   Why the net energy of the universe may be zero while perturbation from zero can temporarily support existence of things like you is but quantum effects writ large.

---

How does that follow from existent quantum particles not being directly energy?

well ... we don't really want to question a statement of belief about god to much; do we?

Your quotes (very easy to do on this messed up forum) are not correct ... the attributions.