So what happened?

[Bucky Ball]

before you turned into a potty mouth ad hoc mud slinger if you remember our first exchanges where very civil. till you began to loose ground. meaning when I would not take an argument down a familiar path that allow you the stereotypical rebuttals you had nothing intellectually left to offer. you then started in your ad hoc campaign.

That methodology of answering tic for tac and then when you are lost going ad hoc is exactly the behavior I had in mind that most of you default to.

This whole thread is a prime example of that for you.

Meaning if my exegetical arguments where deficient in any way then by all of your might and world wisdom you would definitely be destroying me on that front why Because that is my primary objective here. Rather than do that you attack me personally. why? because you have neither the ability or the exegetical knowledge to address any of the spiritual topics we have discussed. So you attack per personally. you attack spelling and grammar then my character, all without any personal knowledge of me outside of what others said. look at your last post. when you where told I claimed to have aids, you sought to details the specifics did not matter you already had and published a damning narrative without a single question to confirm or deny the worst possible story you could make up with this information.

They my slow witted friend is what I mean when I say you could not have 20 polished and well worded theologians hammer at your sunday school understanding of God you parade around like a doctorate. again how you address me with insult and poorly concocted narratives proves this beyond a shadow of a doubt.

This is true for any of you who take the low hanging fruit over a line by line exchanged of real ideas and documented backed statements.

Not one of you especially you buckser has the ability to be bombarded by 10 to 20 people daily who loath you, and you not just abandon all purpose and reason to just sling mud back at them and default to personal insult. I do this every day and have done so for 10 years. I have re imagined and re engineered all of the talking points and typical church preaching styles to conform to a dialog format that conforms to the rules you want to play by. again show when and where you have done that to be manhandled daily by people who think far less of you because in their eyes you are deficient in some way or another yet stay on topic answer each question as if it was the first time you heard it and give each and every single person the benefit of the doubt each and every new post. becaue you don't know when something you could say would spawn a real remark or question.

You made every bit of that up. You're nothing but a delusional liar.
Your "backed statements" are nothing but misrepresentations of the Bible, which NO scholar agrees with.  
Nothing changed. You're nothing but an ignoramus. Go preach somewhere else, and play your little "paradox" games with someone who cares.
That's the second time you BOASTED about 10-20 people, bla bla bla. Why would anyone want to be questioned by a bunch of ignorant fundies ? It's idiotic.
We all get you are VERY VERY impressed with yourself. Nothing you write here has ANY value not any scholarly backing. Go get an education.
And as for potty mouths, YOU have the worst one on this forum. YOU and your hilarious non-hippie Jesus. You are SUCH an angry old man. Religion has done you no good at all.

no  it is proof that the brain is a transmitter and receiver... which Elon musk also has taken a 20 billion dollar interest in.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Since you are ignorant of every other field, why not this one too. You have NO evidence for that crap.
The US navy has been working for years on the nano-connectors to nerve cells in the brain.
You know nothing about neuro-science. If it was "transmitting and receiving" you think the millions of neuro-scientists all over the world would have missed it ? LMAO
You're just an ignorant wacko kook. LOL. We NEVER had civil conversations .... you made that part up also. You've ALWAYS come off as an arrogant prick, suffering from Dunning-Krueger, who thinks WAY more of himself than anyone else does.

1. Musk's total net worth is 20 billion. There is no way HE personally invested his entire fortune in this. So .... 1, you lied or can't understand what you read.
2. You can't even interpret what you read, correctly.
There is nothing, NOTHING AT ALL, about transmitters and receivers in his proposal. You are SO totally ignorant, you cannot even interpret a simple article correctly.
Connecting computers to brains is not about "transmitting and receiving". He's talking about interfacing nerve cells with technology. It does not prove what you are claiming. For decades, EEGs have interpreted natural underlying electrical (nerve) signals in brains. PLEASE. Go get an education.
Soon afterwards, the serial entrepreneur created Neuralink, with the intention of connecting computers directly to human brains. He wants to do this using “neural lace” technology – implanting tiny electrodes into the brain for direct computing capabilities.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) aren’t a new idea. Various forms of BCI are already available, from ones that sit on top of your head and measure brain signals to devices that are implanted into your brain tissue.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2...interfaces
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6256125