So what happened?

[Drich]

Otherwise wouldn't destroying the message with science logic and reason be a much more effective way of handling the matter?

Problem is that you are incapable of recognising when your argument is destroyed. Even when you have to shift the goal posts, for example, by redefining what perpetual means.

but agan the problem is how you destroy arguments...

You call the presenter names.. that to you is discrediting the argument if you can make a name like racist stick.

Meaning if the person can be identified as a racist then his argument is destroyed.

That is not how it works sister.

I have fact and citation always at the ready not once have you been able to 'destroy anything' citing a greater source. no it's all ad hoc and moving the goal post with you all. like this last post you accuse me of changing the definition when I literally cut and pasted it it from GOOGLE!!! then to prove it even cut and pasted the google address from the search I used.

You guys are very dishonest and emotionally driven in everything you do. there is no logic there is no rhyme there is no reason. for example why claim I am changing a definition when clearly it was cut and paste from a official reference source? That is a clear bull shiite move, designed to under mine me. it plays to what you want to believe rather than the facts and truth of it all. yet You are the very one who did such a thing, then claim I don't know when I am being destroyed?

Clearly not if being destroyed is to blindly follow whatever narrative you are telling yourself and selling to your peers.

It's time to grow up.

---

Heat loss is inevitable.  Deal with it.

Boru

I did you ignorant moron it is call K-factor.

Here K-factor is an equation in determining heat loss verses how quickly heat can be replenished by the core.

EG.. We simply do not pump more water down to the heat exchanger than what the planet can replenish in heat.

dealt with, Son...

(even if you still think k-factor is a morning breakfast cereal from general mills)