RE: Deconversion and some doubts
July 30, 2019 at 9:51 pm
(This post was last modified: July 30, 2019 at 9:54 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Again, you’re working with a silent evaluative premise, which is whats required to go from is to ought. The is doesn’t imply anything on its own.
That’s the is ought dilemma.
As to your last question...nothing, in a harm based moral structure with a single metric.
They’re equivalent statements.
My turn, what does any of this have to do with a god?
That’s the is ought dilemma.
As to your last question...nothing, in a harm based moral structure with a single metric.
They’re equivalent statements.
My turn, what does any of this have to do with a god?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
