(August 11, 2019 at 12:41 pm)Acrobat Wrote:(August 11, 2019 at 12:33 pm)Sal Wrote: How about an actual Bigfoot? Foot prints, photos and such can be faked. Same with evidence for a god.
I have to ask: Why is this seen as a distinction?
ID and Paley's design argument have the same flaws as the evidence for Bigfoot: They can easily be faked or taken on an unsteady a priori basis.
So what evidence would convince me of a god existing? First off: A god would know what it would take. Nothing short of a being introducing itself as a god and displaying powers only a god would possess would convince me, personally.
Okay so given that.
Even if it was confirmed that Jesus did in fact came back from death, and all the claims of ID proponents were true, that our reality was designed/created, this wouldn’t be a satisfactory basis for you to believe god exists?
No, it wouldn't for me personally.
But that's just entertaining what-ifs.
