(August 13, 2019 at 12:08 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: You can only be a realist if you adhere to the standard of realism apart from us both.
Which is exactly how moral realism proceeds, as well.
I get that you’re satisfied with your current position. You simply aren’t satisfied with the terms that accurately describe it.
That’s why I keep telling you to own them. If that’s how you think morality works, that’s how you think morality works.
Watching a supernatural subjectivist attempt to take a bunch of natural realists to task over their “subjectivism” has been fucking precious.
Just as watching you repeatedly whip out your dick and stomp it all to shit has been. If you need no reference to a god, then why would anyone else, and how can you explain your confusion as to how atheists justify their moral positions?
How, in short, can you explain the entirety of your interactions on this board?
Who are you quoting? You're referring to what I said, but then it seems like you're addressing Acrobat but Acro just kudosed you despite you referring to him as a supernatural subjectivist.
So I'm confused now. And it's 2:26 AM, so time to sleep, lol
