How to easily defeat any argument for God

[Acrobat]

Objectiveness is a redundant word if it is being implied, in context, that "good" or "bad" is objective.

No it isn't, particularly when some people view good and bad as subjective, and good and bad in non-moral context is often subjective, like pizza taste.

And in particular this discussion, is about the "objective" nature of goodness.

You indicated, you said so, you asserted, you did not demonstrate. And I did not concede that "good/bad" aren't linked to the act, only that "good/bad" do not exist concretely on the act (as in there's no specific location as it's just a descriptor).

Try again.

You conceded that good and bad are not located within any scientific fact, in fact you said they're not located anywhere (at least within the natural world).

Yet you still view good and bad as objective. If they're objectiveness is not located anywhere in the natural facts of reality, then where else would they be located, expect in something non-natural?

You can use whatever mental gymnastics you want to get around this, but it doesn't get around the fact that I laid my case rather clearly, and used your own beliefs to validate it.