RE: Why Red Flag Laws Won't Work.
August 20, 2019 at 1:51 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2019 at 1:55 pm by onlinebiker.)
(August 20, 2019 at 12:41 pm)Brian37 Wrote: DON'T CARE! The time for talk should have ended with Columbine. The time for talk should have ended with Newtown. The time for talk should have ended with Parkland.
Your choices are to get on board, or get the fuck out of the way. The time for talk is over! There is no fucking debate to be had. America has way too much firearm violence. Arm more is not fucking working.
All your respoinses are just your own fucking insecurity because of the needless fear firearm CEOs scared you with.
Scream more bitch.
It's kinda pathetic, but cute.
(August 20, 2019 at 12:50 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(August 20, 2019 at 8:19 am)onlinebiker Wrote: I used to think they were a good idea. Taking guns away from a deranged individual sounds good on the face of it - but would it work?
Probably not.
Why not? Very simple.
It depends on the honest cooperation of a deranged individual.
Consider - when the cops go into someone's house to confiscate guns - how do they know when they have them all? Answer - they have to ask - and trust - the deranged individual in question if they have all the guns.
See the problem?
You think that just MAYBE the guy might have a gun - or 30 stashed somewhere?
Think about this - prisoners in maximum security prisons manage to hide weapons. You think a guy who is free can't manage that trick?
Then also consider - might confiscating some of the guy's guns push him over the edge - and send him out on a killing spree?
Nope. You can't make the world safer by taking away a few guns. You can make it somewhat safer by locking people up.
Are you ready to start locking people up without a trial?
Do you have any objective data on the matter? Or are you just fantasizing out loud?
Objective data?
Of how many guns are stashed?
That'd be a good trick.
But I can show some verifiable history that shows it's likely.
That data enough?