(August 20, 2019 at 5:41 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: No, the constitution’s virtues is measured only by its effects on the people. If people easily destroyed it, then it obviously lacked the wherewithal to serve its alleged purpose, so it never really was so great an idea as it was alleged to be by those who instantly loses all sense or realism and discernment and become starry eyed when the words “constitution” and “forefathers “ are heard.
But the difference between the constitution and Christianity is one of nature, not quality.
Constitution may not have what it took to be a great idea, but its purpose, and the means it proposes to grant itself, were at well intentioned. Not so Christianity. Christianity does not exist in the realm of good intentioned ideas. It exists solely in the realm of evil, and is amongst the most degrading and wickedly misanthropic ideas ever hoisted upon mankind. Right from its earliest moments it employed some of the the most fraudulent and coercive means ever yet used to perpetrate the dominating and and bending to its own aggrandizement of the potential and capabilities of men.
Rather than messing everything up, mankind is actually are an incredible credit to itself because saddled as so much of mankind had been for so long with such a blight as Christianity, it still nonetheless achieve as much as it had done.
The wickedness of Christianity is made more manifest by the fact misanthropic morons besotted by Christianity then snicker at achievements of mankind under the burden of onerous Christianity, just so these morons can exculpate the degrading myth of a god that fucked his own mother to give himself birth so as to save his mother’s people from an alleged sin in which they had no part and was permitted by himself.
You gotta be kidding me.
