(October 5, 2019 at 8:31 am)Ricardo Wrote:(October 4, 2019 at 11:47 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Oh great. Ricardo spams yet another forum.
It's a coincidence!
Is it? OK then.
The burden of proof lies fairly and squarely with the claimant.
If they claim there is a god, then they are on the hook to provide evidence for said claimed deity.
If YOU, in response, make the claim that you do not believe in any god and/or gods then you are on the hook to provide evidence for that claim.
Your argument then becomes as follows...
"I claim that I do not believe in any god and/or gods. As evidence I present the simple fact that I do not believe in any god and/or gods." and you are done. Nothing further is required, or can be demanded as evidence.