RE: Trying close to my best to rationalize Christianity
January 15, 2020 at 9:56 am
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2020 at 9:58 am by sausagerock.)
(January 14, 2020 at 9:40 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: Gonna keep an eye on this thread. Welcome to the forums BTW.
Using our production of AI as an analog to a perfect God creating a designed creation falls on its face immediately. Also, probably the first use for AIs will be as sex workers. That is what is being done with the non-intelligent dolls right now so really we are not that similar to the Christian God. Why does it seem ok to you that a perfect God would create something and then blame the creation for failing to act correctly? That just blows my mind.
We don't have enough evidence to figure whether they are gonna e sex dolls or bank workers. ''probably'' won't make one argument stronger than other, I believe.
Our organic system and the universe around is far more complex than what would be a humanoid AI we make first. If we were made, it would be far far further in their evolvement than we have gotten, which means perhaps different problems and different reasons to make an AI. That aside, what would be the first reason we couldn't be raised to be sex dolls or companions or whatev to them?
Gods omniscience and perfection is most obviously relative to us and even there struggles. As you can clearly see in Bible, God couldn't snap his fingers and make everyone perfect for him - there are limits just as we would have to a ancestral simulation we could run. We would be able to do a lot, but not everything, and not everything would be throughout right.
Don't miss the point, don't look at God as something other than civilization just as ours.
(January 14, 2020 at 11:26 pm)brewer Wrote: One fantasy used to try to explain or justify another? I think I'm done with this one.
Using the "Serious" tag didn't help.
One sci-fi to explain another, don't confuse the two. Science fiction is btw in most cases before science.
