RE: Trying close to my best to rationalize Christianity
January 15, 2020 at 6:46 pm
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2020 at 7:10 pm by sausagerock.)
Biggest problem with AI is going to be figuring out whether they work fine or not to rule out a possibility of them manipulating us. That's a tough task and we don't have even a close idea as to how that might work.
Uh, you didn't really comment my post so much as laid out your view of Christianity.
Comment on YOUR ideas I will, though I see that I must repeat myself a bit...
As I keep explaining, which is actually very obvious reading Bible, God's (or the higher creator-people) power isn't as omni-max as many are naively thinking for some reason. It is clear that humans they created were not perfect and that methods they tried were not perfect either. Their power is pretty mighty in relation to us though. If they created us then basically they can manipulate unimaginable things, as this might be just a simulation on maybe some sort of a computer. Imagine this simulation being run by us for it to make sense.
ET hypothesis, no matter how likely that might seem, has less ground to stand on for there is factually nothing at all that a larger group of people have agreed on experiencing. Saying that ET is more likely to exist than God requires some logical arguments, taking in account what information we have on both topics. I don't rule out ET though, I think that this universe can hold multiple simulations from higher civilizations.
So, about why he wasn't just always around. As creators were dealing with an AI, they had to make a system that is absolutely convincing in the end whether this AI will hold you for authority and trust you completely or not. Bible shows a way that would work quite convincingly. If under these circumstances and options we can take in our life still believe that the ones our creators gave us are the best, we most certainly are thinking similarly like them and would be cool to live among them. More points also because we have to trust that quite a bit, takes effort.
Again, they did not really expect them to fail, the rest of your argument seems like just not taking in account my original one, sorry
Uh, you didn't really comment my post so much as laid out your view of Christianity.
Comment on YOUR ideas I will, though I see that I must repeat myself a bit...
As I keep explaining, which is actually very obvious reading Bible, God's (or the higher creator-people) power isn't as omni-max as many are naively thinking for some reason. It is clear that humans they created were not perfect and that methods they tried were not perfect either. Their power is pretty mighty in relation to us though. If they created us then basically they can manipulate unimaginable things, as this might be just a simulation on maybe some sort of a computer. Imagine this simulation being run by us for it to make sense.
ET hypothesis, no matter how likely that might seem, has less ground to stand on for there is factually nothing at all that a larger group of people have agreed on experiencing. Saying that ET is more likely to exist than God requires some logical arguments, taking in account what information we have on both topics. I don't rule out ET though, I think that this universe can hold multiple simulations from higher civilizations.
So, about why he wasn't just always around. As creators were dealing with an AI, they had to make a system that is absolutely convincing in the end whether this AI will hold you for authority and trust you completely or not. Bible shows a way that would work quite convincingly. If under these circumstances and options we can take in our life still believe that the ones our creators gave us are the best, we most certainly are thinking similarly like them and would be cool to live among them. More points also because we have to trust that quite a bit, takes effort.
Again, they did not really expect them to fail, the rest of your argument seems like just not taking in account my original one, sorry
