RE: Is God a logical contradiction?
February 19, 2020 at 2:17 pm
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2020 at 2:21 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
You're still trying to bicker over contents, which is how I know that you've failed to understand a stolen concept despite much effort by many members to explain it to you.
It is -fine- if you think that we can't observe consciousness.
But again, as you note, these are the terms, these are the methods.
Exactly! Those are the asserted facts of b. You think they are not facts. You cannot assert the facts of b, and so require the facts of b, if your position is that they are not facts of b. This conversation could be about bananas or xylophones or the price of gulf shrimp in maine....this form is always invalid, always a stolen concept.
-and you could fix it. You could fix it, but you just can't bring yourself to accept that even though your position may be valid and true, you've chosen to express it in an invalid way. It cannot be true -as stated-, but that doesn't mean that it can't be true.
I could even offer a little bit of that basic psychology - the reason that you refuse to jettison the self refuting component of your statements about your own beliefs..is that you greatly value the self refuting portion. You hilariously claimed, for example, that science was your religion. This is why you cannot give up science, even as you call it's fundamental premises into question while simultaneously asserting the same. This is usually why a person decides to steal a concept. It has value, and makes their statement seem more credible - not just to others, to themselves.
It is -fine- if you think that we can't observe consciousness.
But again, as you note, these are the terms, these are the methods.
Exactly! Those are the asserted facts of b. You think they are not facts. You cannot assert the facts of b, and so require the facts of b, if your position is that they are not facts of b. This conversation could be about bananas or xylophones or the price of gulf shrimp in maine....this form is always invalid, always a stolen concept.
-and you could fix it. You could fix it, but you just can't bring yourself to accept that even though your position may be valid and true, you've chosen to express it in an invalid way. It cannot be true -as stated-, but that doesn't mean that it can't be true.
I could even offer a little bit of that basic psychology - the reason that you refuse to jettison the self refuting component of your statements about your own beliefs..is that you greatly value the self refuting portion. You hilariously claimed, for example, that science was your religion. This is why you cannot give up science, even as you call it's fundamental premises into question while simultaneously asserting the same. This is usually why a person decides to steal a concept. It has value, and makes their statement seem more credible - not just to others, to themselves.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
