RE: Is God a logical contradiction?
February 19, 2020 at 4:34 pm
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2020 at 4:42 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
You can never observe a cat, in fact. You can observe the correlates of a cat, things like seeing a furry impression gifted to you by your sensory system and processed through many layers of revision...but you can't observe a cat.
Also...the cat knows things that you, the cat researcher, just don't.
Like I said, I'm certain that you're confusing being able to watch a show a person is watching, and knowing whether or not they're watching a show. You'd gag if you knew how many times this conversation has been had on the boards. That's "what the cat knows"..that you don't, or what the subject knows, that you don't. Here you are, deadset on having some argument with me about methodological disagreements, but that's not what makes something a stolen concept or rescues it from being one, either.
That would be asserting, and thus requiring, the validity of any methodology while simultaneously attempting to disprove it's validity. Or, you know, just not doing that, because you don't have to. You can still attempt to disprove that validity, you just need a valid preamble to replace the self refuting one, and you can even be right about it!
Also...the cat knows things that you, the cat researcher, just don't.
Like I said, I'm certain that you're confusing being able to watch a show a person is watching, and knowing whether or not they're watching a show. You'd gag if you knew how many times this conversation has been had on the boards. That's "what the cat knows"..that you don't, or what the subject knows, that you don't. Here you are, deadset on having some argument with me about methodological disagreements, but that's not what makes something a stolen concept or rescues it from being one, either.
That would be asserting, and thus requiring, the validity of any methodology while simultaneously attempting to disprove it's validity. Or, you know, just not doing that, because you don't have to. You can still attempt to disprove that validity, you just need a valid preamble to replace the self refuting one, and you can even be right about it!
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
