RE: Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position
February 20, 2020 at 9:56 pm
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2020 at 10:00 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(February 20, 2020 at 6:19 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:Not only that he lusted after her years before marrying her and lusted after another girl while sill a child.Also love how he thinks religion provides any consistent definition of evil(February 20, 2020 at 5:40 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Okay, I get it. Just don't throw accusations if you're not ready to back them up.What on earth are you talking about, lol. Your religion says Big Mo took a child bride. That's hardly me accusing the useless fucker of anything.
Quote:Your system does look like a black box you're afraid to open. I bet you'll run into some kind of inconsistency once you define evil without resorting to anything religious.Your inability to imagine or even research the many ways that evil can be defined without religion is your own problem. Not mine. It's as easy for me to have a morality without religion as it is for you to have a morality without christianity.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
