Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position

[R00tKiT]

Life emerged after by bilions of years those constants of the universe were in place. Life was tuned by those constants, not the other way around. And tuned by death of those beings that had bad genetic traits whyle others that did, thrived and reproduced.

Your forgot to mention the conditions that made this tuning possible, which are the relevant part.

And yes, there is a vast amount of evidence for evolution. It is a fact an undeniable truth. Those like you that deny it, do it from ignorance and worse, for religious motivations as I stand witness. Do yourself a favour and read other books, even experiment what they teach. You can try peas, easy to study even a monk can do it. Reading your favourite religious books and drivel just do... nothing, except perhaps upping your DK effect and personal pride.

I have nothing else to say to you, you would require proper education and a few years studying many books, not just one, to know what you are talking about.

I don't recall denying evolution altogether, that's just your strawman urge to make replying easier. It's curious how you so called skeptics would have absolutely no doubt in the existence of a process that took billions of years, and that it worked in every step of the way, while excluding any possibility of intelligent intervention in each and every year in these billions.

And the macroevolution part of your undeniable theory isn't that dense with solid evidence. Certainly not dense enough to make our sense of wonder some completely illusory perception.