RE: Agnosticism IS the most dishonest position
March 4, 2020 at 5:49 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2020 at 5:50 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:No, it’s because he’s mature enough to ignore the insult-slinging peanut gallery,Actually the reason he's not responding is he knows it's all true, And knows if he piped in we would be able to show clear examples of what were talking about.Nothing mature about that.
Quote: and stay focused on the actual substantive discussions being had.His duplicity isn't part of he discussion or of substance? .That's an interesting take.
Quote: You guys are just butt-hurt because you can’t get a reaction out of him, lolNo we fully expect he won't rise .We expect him to sink .Sink as to not expose himself.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM