Hmm.
This is a rather weak argument to design. I don't agree with this one, although I do like other versions.
I've noticed that people on here are constantly calling for empirical evidence for God's existence - fair enough. I'd be interested to know, do you guys ever get anyone bringing up ontological arguments for the existence of God? The reason I ask is that by their nature they require no empirical evidence - they argue that God's existence is a logical necessity, like 2+2=4, or p=p. No observational evidence required!
In case you jump on me, I'll say now that I don't think they work. It might be interesting to discuss though - make a change?
Cleanthes
This is a rather weak argument to design. I don't agree with this one, although I do like other versions.
I've noticed that people on here are constantly calling for empirical evidence for God's existence - fair enough. I'd be interested to know, do you guys ever get anyone bringing up ontological arguments for the existence of God? The reason I ask is that by their nature they require no empirical evidence - they argue that God's existence is a logical necessity, like 2+2=4, or p=p. No observational evidence required!
In case you jump on me, I'll say now that I don't think they work. It might be interesting to discuss though - make a change?
Cleanthes