Not that much of a change then 
How about modal ontological arguments? I don't think they're circular or beg the question (although they come close). Here's one:
1: God is by definition eternal - i.e. he could not come into existence or leave existence, since he is not a contingent being.
2: If God exists, his existence is necessary (from 1)
3: If God does not exist, his existence is impossible (from 1)
4: God's existence is either necessary or impossible (from 2,3)
5: If God's existence was impossible, then the idea of God would be logically contradictory.
6: The idea of God is not logically contradictory.
7: God's existence is not logically impossible (from 5,6)
8: God's existence is necessary (from 4,7)
9: God exists (from 8).
What do you think?
Cleanthes

How about modal ontological arguments? I don't think they're circular or beg the question (although they come close). Here's one:
1: God is by definition eternal - i.e. he could not come into existence or leave existence, since he is not a contingent being.
2: If God exists, his existence is necessary (from 1)
3: If God does not exist, his existence is impossible (from 1)
4: God's existence is either necessary or impossible (from 2,3)
5: If God's existence was impossible, then the idea of God would be logically contradictory.
6: The idea of God is not logically contradictory.
7: God's existence is not logically impossible (from 5,6)
8: God's existence is necessary (from 4,7)
9: God exists (from 8).
What do you think?
Cleanthes