Here is why you should believe in God.

[R00tKiT]

That looks like a big fat no...if I dont consider the reasons™ you gave to be good reasons™, and you don't have others to offer.  You would, instead, like me to consider that my disregard for those reasons™ is a mistake.  Okay, considered.  Truly, and it isn't.  You've given no good reason.

Take a breath, pal. You made mistakes when dismissing good points of mine. Mistakes. If you really can't bring yourself to acknowledge some, maybe that is the reason why whatever is written to you is never a good reason. Namely, you can't recognize one when you see it.

I'm only asking whether or not you have something else..because right or wrong, what you've offered isn't convincing.

Why do you need something else? I prefer discussing one tiny detail fully and agreeing on it than zapping through what might or might not be good reasons.

You don't have the first clue as to what axioms I appeal to

Do you react to your house being stolen any differently to the rest of people? If remarkable clues like smashed windows, broken handles and less money in your bag point to - in your worldview - a sophisticated, intelligent burglar, then clearly I have some first clue to what axioms you appeal to - when you're pressed. If you think some magical movement of wind blowing around your house accounts for the crime scene , just tell me about it.
Frankly, I am not interested to read more babble about why you're not willing to consider my reasons, since you're clearly reluctant to any kind of lengthy, meaningful discussion.

All people act on this sense you bigoted piece of shit, lol.  -You- think that the only way to act appropriately is to be a msulim..but you think that because you're a bigoted piece of shit.

Are the insults thrown a display of your moral realism ... by any chance?

An argument to consequences is invalid no matter what consequences you might imagine.  A true thing can have terrible consequences.  Do you understand?

Where did you see the word "argument" mentioned? Acting on the sense of wonder is a good reason to believe. If you're that reluctant to consider an argument to negative consequences, consider ignoring your more vital senses of hunger, thirst, etc. as long as you can. Just to see how long your reluctance to act on the obvious -because there might be a fallacy somewhere- can hold.

-and I;d suggest that you look into prescriptive and natural law.  You offered a textbook equivocation.  I don't need to argue it or point to some novel religious viewpoint.  That;s what you did..and why you are wrong, logically speaking. 

what textbooks are you exactly referring to... pal? legal theory's? you think you can just infer some arbitrary disctinction in legal texts to the whole universe.. and run away with it?
Read again : descriptive laws exist instead of no intelligible law at all.
Sure, you don't need to argue it. Just don't make mistakes.

Still haven't left your faith, huh?  Fucking liar.  Silly, stupid, predicatable liar. No one made you that way...not even your religion...it was a personal choice.

Gratz on that, liar.

You cant argue, by good reason...upon which you insist... that your stupid fucking god is really real.  If you could, you would have by now.  Prove me wrong.  Do something different next post.

It's not difficult to see why what's presented isn't a good reason to you. Someone used to badmouthing inside conversations intended to be serious, unable to acknowledge the tiniest screw ups he makes can hardly recognize good reasons.

So hop hop you dumb son of a bitch.

Moral realism in action.. again? A better upbringing would've helped.. maybe, but I can't help it.