(April 17, 2020 at 8:06 pm)Prof.Lunaphiles Wrote:(April 17, 2020 at 8:00 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: There's nothing wrong with the definitions of any of the terms. You simply misused them. In your defense, you misused them in a culturally specific way, explicitly.
Maybe you should help yourself before you offer help to others?
What's the definition of religion, that you believe to be valid?
If it is not "the exercises for the maintenance of dignity," then it is wrong.
Please cite your source from which you got this definition.
I was going to deconstruct you entire response to me, but anyone with this definition for religion may not be worth the time.
And anyone who claims that their definition (that is unique to only themself) is the only correct one, is certainly not worth the time.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
