RE: Islam
May 21, 2020 at 4:24 pm
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2020 at 4:24 pm by Peebothuhlu.)
(May 21, 2020 at 12:42 pm)WinterHold Wrote:(May 21, 2020 at 5:47 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
So, first off I understand that English possibly isn't your native dialogue and so kudos to you fellow sophont for being able to manage more than one language.
For your edification I have actually worked with my country's law enforcers and I know the history behind why they are armed.
Did you know that standard British police officers are generally unarmed? (Note my understanding of things in England may be horribly outdated. Am quite happy to be informed and updated)
Do you know why this is so?
As for 'Criminals', yes my time assisting my constabulary and watching 'Criminals' "In the wild" as it were has certainly changed my veiws in regards to such people....
But certainly not to the extent that we should be mutilating them
Please try to broaden your mental horizons.
Cheers.
Thank you for your kind gesture.
Yes I read about that -UK normal cops being unarmed-. But still the SAS and counter terrorism are armed to the teeth.
It all falls to our different views about what works better for the victim of the criminal act; I already mentioned that in a just system this kind of penalty is a healer for the victim; and I gave an example with one losing their life savings to robbery and theft.
The society can crumble if theft is widespread, take Middle Eastern and African countries as an example, enduring such horrible crime can only be redeemed -in my view- via taking something dear from the criminal.
Uhhh.. what?
Perhaps you should 'Back up' a step. You are aware that the British SAS are ARMY special froces, right?
As in... Military personel trained to a very high skill level that then specialize in certain feilds of which "Counter Terrorism" is but onew facet?
The British government. Instead of ARMING their police to deal with dangerous threats. Keep their police 'relativly' unarmed ( I think there are special 'FLying Squads' but I don't want to digress) and, instead, spend the time, effort and money to specially pick and train professoinals of their armed forces to help bolster their policing force.
Now.. if you then ALSO want to besmirch an armed force who can trace its history quite a distance into past history? That's fine. I'll let possible forum members set your misunderstanding about such straight.
So... It would seem that you DON'T know why British police are unarmed while American police generally are?
As for your remabling in relation to 'Healing' and such? I am going to be generous and think that your handling of the English language is, sadly, not up to the task of translating yout thoughts.
Interesting.
Not at work.