Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 29, 2024, 10:03 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Applicability of Maths to the Universe
#66
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe
(June 16, 2020 at 1:10 pm)polymath257 Wrote: And I would say that this is directly contradicted by Godel's results. There are *always* questions that cannot be answered. it isn't simply a matter of not knowing, but that the issue cannot be resolved without making an arbitrary choice in our axioms.
Are there?  To whom or what?  Godel?  Math?  It doesn't seem like we've exhausted the full list of knowers or knowledge.  This would not be enough to reject platonism as a metaphysical stance.  If we assumed that there were some mathematical objects that demonstrably proved mathematical platonism false (and much more from doing it purely by axiom, as we address below) then a platonist can simply concede that mathematical objects are mental objects (and this isn't the only concession that can be made).  It may be the case that there are not always cognitive answers for mental objects.  This would surprise no one.  Satisfied expressions of taste, like "yum" are not cognitive objects, they cannot be true or false, though we've been known to mistake them as such - on account of being satisfied pattern seekers.  

However, in an effort to maintain the position, it will always be posited first and foremost, that we've got something wrong, perhaps as a consequence of our axioms...and what we've got wrong may be godels results.  

Quote:Well, we *know* that set theory isn't complete in the sense that all meaningful questions have answers that can be proven. And, in any supplemental system, there will ALWAYS be new questions that cannot be answered.

And the *only* real way to resolve such questions is to *arbitrarily* choose which way we want the axioms to go.

Now, we can make such choices based on things like aesthetics, but there is no way to determine the truth or falsity without making additional assumptions.
Which is a leveler for platonism.  If it's just a disagreement over axioms, and if the things that are taken to be indicative that platonism might be false are merely products of differing axioms or aesthetics.....
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Grandizer - June 9, 2020 at 3:31 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 10, 2020 at 10:22 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Grandizer - June 13, 2020 at 12:29 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 13, 2020 at 3:45 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 13, 2020 at 10:13 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Belacqua - June 13, 2020 at 10:08 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Belacqua - June 13, 2020 at 10:15 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 13, 2020 at 10:24 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Grandizer - June 13, 2020 at 10:47 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 14, 2020 at 7:28 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 14, 2020 at 11:00 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Grandizer - June 15, 2020 at 11:15 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Rahn127 - June 16, 2020 at 5:20 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 16, 2020 at 6:51 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by no one - June 16, 2020 at 5:40 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Rahn127 - June 16, 2020 at 7:44 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Grandizer - June 16, 2020 at 11:08 am
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 16, 2020 at 3:08 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Jehanne - June 16, 2020 at 12:19 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Rahn127 - June 16, 2020 at 2:15 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by The Grand Nudger - June 16, 2020 at 3:01 pm
RE: Applicability of Maths to the Universe - by Grandizer - June 17, 2020 at 12:08 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Photo Popular atheist says universe is not a work of art like a painting Walter99 32 4123 March 22, 2021 at 1:24 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  I am a pixieist, what do you think of my proof that universe creating pixies exist? Simon Moon 69 12081 November 13, 2016 at 9:16 am
Last Post: Expired
  What's your crazy ideas about the existence of the universe? Vegamo 32 9248 April 1, 2014 at 2:30 pm
Last Post: archangle
  Is the universe God? Lek 89 23447 February 9, 2014 at 1:07 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  I know how the universe was created Chriswt 36 21643 November 27, 2012 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Vincent Sauve
  This cruel universe I love so dearly Purple Rabbit 36 20879 July 13, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Last Post: Purple Rabbit



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)