(July 9, 2020 at 1:34 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(July 9, 2020 at 1:29 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: No, you don’t get it. Try thinking of it this way: In Trump’s case, a sealed indictment would extend the statute of limitations until he leaves office, either in 2021 or in 2024.
I agree that candidates should be required to disclose their financial history, but a constitutional amendment is a stupid way to go about it.
Boru
What?
Bank CEO, and employee meet to discuss employment,
Bank CEO, " Well Mam/sir, I would love to give you the job, but can I see your financials?"
Person applying for the job, "No, that is my private business".
Bank CEO, (metaphor for american voters) "Ok, I guess I went too far."
Putin, "EXCELLENT"
Do you understand the difference between a regular law and a constitutional amendment?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
