(September 25, 2020 at 5:25 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(September 25, 2020 at 5:00 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: I don't think I'll ever get over an election where we won by 3 million votes but the loser gets to be our President because of a technicality of our ridiculously outdated system, resulting in a supremely unqualified con-artist to be the leader of a country where he has enjoyed not one day of popular support, and then he runs our country into the ground, just like we knew he would.
You see the Electoral College as a "technicality". A problem.
And why didn't Obama, Clinton, Carter, Johnson and Kennedy do something about getting it changed?
It seems your heroes were not offended by it.
Maybe you need better heroes...
I assume you're not an American and you just don't understand that getting an amendment ratified to our federal constitution is not something that can be done by executive order. It's a very difficult process and, in this case, it's just not going to happen with one of our two political parties benefiting from it.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
