RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 26, 2020 at 5:39 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2020 at 5:40 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:If Biden wins the election - should they expand the number of Justices so Biden can appoint new justices more favorable to his agenda?It has nothing to do with his agenda. It has everything to do with countering the Republican agenda to stack the court with unqualified partisan lunatics.
Quote:Yes? Really want to set that precedence?It's that or let the Republicans set precedent .
(September 26, 2020 at 5:35 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:According to them it was(September 26, 2020 at 5:31 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: He started this bullshit by rewriting the rules about appointing judges during an election year thus denying Obama the ability to appoint a judge . This is a clear attempt to stack the court . And whether 1969 or 1856 there is a precedent and the Republicans are clearly games so the left need a counter .
I’m not sure that was ever a ‘rule’. A cynical, hypocritical dick move of epic proportions, but not a rule change.
Boru
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
