RE: Separation of Science and State
November 16, 2020 at 5:19 am
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2020 at 5:23 am by John 6IX Breezy.)
You've noticed the problem then: you can't have a single-person religion but not a single-person government.
I agree a person can govern themselves (verb) but can a single person be a government (noun)?
In terms of basic English it's coherent to say that Christianity will exist as long as there is a Christian to practice it. But it doesn't make sense to say a Church exists with only one individual. But given that your definition differs, and a church is a religion, you have two options: Either governments and religions require at minimum one person to exist, or two.
I agree a person can govern themselves (verb) but can a single person be a government (noun)?
In terms of basic English it's coherent to say that Christianity will exist as long as there is a Christian to practice it. But it doesn't make sense to say a Church exists with only one individual. But given that your definition differs, and a church is a religion, you have two options: Either governments and religions require at minimum one person to exist, or two.