This whole thread is merely John's attempt to equate science and religion as faith based views of reality.
It is an exercise doomed to failure. Why?
Because science has ALL of the evidence and religion has none whatsoever.
Because science is testable and religion is not.
Because science is subject to review and change but religion is not.
John will likely never understand the difference.
It is an exercise doomed to failure. Why?
Because science has ALL of the evidence and religion has none whatsoever.
Because science is testable and religion is not.
Because science is subject to review and change but religion is not.
John will likely never understand the difference.