Separation of Science and State

[Abaddon_ire]

Me: "Religion is not a primitive form of science because it's claims tend to be established through revelation not experimentation" (page 7).

You: "This whole thread is merely John's attempt to equate science and religion as faith based views of reality" (page 16).

I never said or claimed that religion is a primitive form of science. That was someone else.

I said you are attempting to equate religion and science as faith based world views.

Try reading for comprehension next time.

Now, given you are unable to even identify which poster you are replying to, how credible do you think that makes you appear?