(November 26, 2020 at 6:15 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: For the gazillionth time, evolution doesn't explain away fine-tuning. You can describe all the processes you want that led to what we see, that doesn't negate a designer who intended all along for the universe to devolve into its present form -through these processes.That post was about beauty, not fine tuning. You stated that beauty was evidence of design, which it most certainly isn't.
But yes, evolution does answer some fine-tuning arguments, but certainly not all. For instance, life in some radically different form could exist with some physical constants being quite different. What that exact set of life-allowing constants is, we don't know, but life in some form might exist in a universe that was different from ours.
Life evolves to fit the universe -- the universe isn't designed to make a particular form of life.
If your belief in God is founded on the fine-tuning argument, you may find yourself disappointed one day. You should read the opinion of actual scientists, such as Sean Carroll. He has a nice debate on Youtube with William Lane Craig, and while both perform well, Carroll clearly makes the better case.
