RE: The absurd need for logical proofs for God
November 27, 2020 at 5:56 pm
(This post was last modified: November 27, 2020 at 5:57 pm by LadyForCamus.)
Because I’m not quoting that text wall:
@Klorophyll
Are you actively working at being this wrong or does it just come to you naturally? Science has already explained how snowflakes and rock formations form naturally. Do you contest that fact? Go ahead. I’d love to hear that.
And as I pointed out to you in our first conversation on this argument months ago, you’re just blatantly equivocating on the word ‘design’ here. Your rebuttal is an explicit equivocation fallacy. You have to fix this and try again. I’ll wait.
@Klorophyll
Quote:This sentence is ridiculous, lady. You can't prove that rock formation or snowflakes aren't designed. That's a negative assertion.
Are you actively working at being this wrong or does it just come to you naturally? Science has already explained how snowflakes and rock formations form naturally. Do you contest that fact? Go ahead. I’d love to hear that.
Quote:Describing no matter how exhaustively the formation of a snowflake doesn't explain away the intervention of a supreme being. What makes you assert that a god wouldn't include all the things you cited in some bigger or lengthier design scheme anyway?
And as I pointed out to you in our first conversation on this argument months ago, you’re just blatantly equivocating on the word ‘design’ here. Your rebuttal is an explicit equivocation fallacy. You have to fix this and try again. I’ll wait.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
