The absurd need for logical proofs for God

[Angrboda]

You are the one who invokes human designed objects as evidence of design in nature, dipshit. You can’t even agree with yourself on which definition of design you’re going with depending on the day. Quit before all your integrity is lost, guy.

Now you're resorting to lies ? I clearly stated that aspects of adaptation of means to ends around us are the evidence of design, not human designed objects.

So, let me try again : what's your definition of design ?

I don't have time to respond to the rest at this time, but since you've raised the point multiple times, I have to ask, in the interest of clarity, what ends you are suggesting the universe is clearly adapted toward achieving? The universe isn't in any sense adapted toward the end of being itself, so its fine-tuning seems an unlikely meaning. If you are claiming the universe appears adapted for the existence of life, then you are simply wrong. Life is opportunistic, in as much as it is clearly defined -- which it isn't. This is why I asked you twice, neither time of which you responded, what your beliefs in the relation between fine-tuning and evolution are. If you truly believe they are related, demonstrate how. Otherwise I'm justified in dismissing the whole ill-defined mess.