RE: The absurd need for logical proofs for God
December 6, 2020 at 8:51 pm
(This post was last modified: December 6, 2020 at 8:52 pm by Simon Moon.)
Klorophill, do you know what kind of universe would be a lot more compelling as evidence for a god?
It would be a universe that looks exactly as if there is no way to could bring forth and sustain life, yet life would exist anyway. Your god is powerful enough to do that, right?
I mean, if he really wanted to, he could have us living on the surface of a star, and thriving, right? Or is this the only universe he could have created?
Yet instead, he chose to create a universe that looks as if it does not seem to need him at all. And to make things even worse, he needs theists like you, to come up with flawed arguments (personal incredulity seems to be your go to), to us nonbelievers.
Not a very impressive deity you got there...
It would be a universe that looks exactly as if there is no way to could bring forth and sustain life, yet life would exist anyway. Your god is powerful enough to do that, right?
I mean, if he really wanted to, he could have us living on the surface of a star, and thriving, right? Or is this the only universe he could have created?
Yet instead, he chose to create a universe that looks as if it does not seem to need him at all. And to make things even worse, he needs theists like you, to come up with flawed arguments (personal incredulity seems to be your go to), to us nonbelievers.
Not a very impressive deity you got there...
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
