RE: The absurd need for logical proofs for God
December 8, 2020 at 8:02 pm
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2020 at 8:03 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:Many atheists I talked to had no problem conceding the existence of a first cause. Infinite regress runs into many logical problems under most definitions of infinity.Good for them, And no it doesn't no matter how much you want it to be true

Quote:It's understandable though that you want these arguments to fail, it's your last remaining fortress anywayNope if they were good I would accept them. They aren't so I don't. Why would I need a fortress against some loon throwing specks of sand at me? Because that's all you have. You, on the other hand, Cower behind that pile of sand and in desperation call it an impregnable bastion even as it crumbles in front of you.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM